ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Prostate Cancer Patient Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is a challenging procedure. The following key points need to be considered: the peritoneal cavity integrity, adjustment of the trocar positions to the peritoneal dialysis (PD) tube location, and the oncological and functional outcomes. We present a clinical case of a patient on CAPD, incidentally diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) during the pre-transplant evaluation. The patient suffered from LUTS, due to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). A transurethral bladder neck incision (TUNI), with median lobe resection, was performed. A PCa Gleason score of six (3 + 3) was found in the histopathological specimen. The primary procedure was complicated by bladder neck sclerosis and acute urinary retention (AUR), resolved by suprapubic cystostomy. After proper staging determination, the patient was qualified for laparoscopic extraperitoneal RP. The standard trocar placement was modified to align with the route of the PD tube, and Retzius' space scarring was released to allow extraperitoneal prostatectomy. There were no signs of peritoneal wall damage or dialysis tube displacement. Peritoneal dialysis was resumed after 4 weeks. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal RP should be considered as an acceptable treatment method for selected patients with localized prostate cancer, allowing CAPD resumption. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of retroperitoneal laparoscopic RP being used in the PD population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.