Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330110›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Correlation of Repeat Measurements of 27 Candidate Protein Markers for Colorectal Cancer Screening Taken Three Years and Multiple Freeze-Thaw Cycles Apart.

Megha Bhardwaj, Petra Schrotz-King, Hermann Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megha BhardwajDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3699-0275
Petra Schrotz-KingDivision of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4339-3492
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6129-1572

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BR1704/16-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years the blood proteome has been increasingly researched for biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). Blood samples from screening studies are often subject to preanalytical variability and repeated freeze−thaw cycles. We aimed to assess the correlation of repeat measurements of 27 candidate protein markers for CRC screening taken three years and multiple freeze−thaw cycles apart. The concentrations of 27 protein markers were measured in plasma samples of 39 newly detected CRC cases from a cohort of 9245 participants of screening colonoscopies. The proteins were measured using proximity extension assays (PEA) carried out on the same set of samples twice, three years apart, with an average of three freeze−thaw cycles in between the two measurements. Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficients were calculated. Correlation coefficients ranged from +0.43 to +0.97, with a median of 0.67 and an interquartile range of +0.58 to +0.84, with all p-values of correlation being <0.01 (<0.0005 for 22 proteins, <0.001 for 4 proteins). Repeat measurements of the 27 protein biomarkers for CRC screening performed three years later, and on average three freeze−thaw cycles apart, showed moderate to high levels of correlation. Apart from the effects of freeze−thaw cycles, slightly different preprocessing performed on the data may have contributed to recorded differences between measurements.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerfreeze–thaw cyclesplasma proteinsproximity extension assayssample handling

Identifiers

PMID35330110
PMCPMC8949042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.