Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330050›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Epidural Catheterization in Obstetrics: A Checklist-Based Video Assessment of Free Available Video Material.

Armin N Flinspach, Florian J Raimann, Richard Schalk, Lena Bepler, Miriam Ruesseler, Mairen H Flinspach, Kai Zacharowski, Jasmina Sterz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Labour epidural checklist - A step towards safety.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Armin N FlinspachDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2886-8947
Florian J RaimannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6597-9585
Richard SchalkDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Lena BeplerFrankfurt Interdisciplinary Simulation Center FIneST, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Miriam RuesselerFrankfurt Interdisciplinary Simulation Center FIneST, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7494-0159
Mairen H FlinspachDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Sana Clinic Offenbach GmbH, 63069 Offenbach am Main, Germany.
Kai ZacharowskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Jasmina SterzFrankfurt Interdisciplinary Simulation Center FIneST, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidural catheterization has become an indispensable part of modern pain therapy, for example, in obstetrics. Learning how to master this skill is an important competency. Videos are among the information sources with the highest information content for learning such skills. The present study aims to analyze videos regarding epidural catheter placement provided on the YouTube platform based on a validated checklist. An expert workshop selected crucial items for learning epidural catheterization in obstetrics. Items were identified and optimized in a five-step testing process. Using this checklist, videos from YouTube were evaluated by eleven health care professionals. Sixteen videos were identified and analyzed. Concerning the catheterization-specific part of the checklist, only two videos showed satisfactory quality. In the didactic part, eleven out of 21 items reached a mean score >50% of the points. Regarding interrater reliability, the catheterization-specific checklist was shown to be substantial (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.610), and the didactic part was shown to be fair (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.401). Overall, standard monitoring and appropriate aseptic technique were followed in only 42% and 49% for the procedure. There was a significant correlation between the runtime and the content quality (p < 0.001). No correlation could be found in terms of platform rating parameters. The video quality varied highly in terms of the requirements of this practical skill. The majority appear unsuitable for self-study due to serious errors and deficiencies regarding patient safety. However, there is no quality control on free platforms. Accordingly, it is difficult to identify suitable videos for educational purposes.

Indexed as

anesthesiaeducationepiduralinstructional film and videoobstetric painobstetricspain management

Identifiers

PMID35330050
PMCPMC8953318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.