Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330035›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Goals of Care Conversations in Long-Term Care during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Laurie Mallery, Nabha Shetty, Paige Moorhouse, Ashley Paige Miller, Maia von Maltzahn, Melissa Buckler, Tanya MacLeod, Samuel A Stewart, Anne Marie Krueger-Naug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Redefining Frailty: Planning Care Through the Frailty Trajectory Model.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurie MalleryDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Nabha ShettyDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Paige MoorhouseDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Ashley Paige MillerDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Maia von MaltzahnDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Melissa BucklerNova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7, Canada.
Tanya MacLeodContinuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Samuel A StewartDepartment of Community Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Anne Marie Krueger-NaugDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.

Funding

Nova Scotia Covid-19 Health 334 Coalition. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goals of care discussions typically focus on decision maker preference and underemphasize prognosis and outcomes related to frailty, resulting in poorly informed decisions. Our objective was to determine whether navigated care planning with nursing home residents or their decision makers changed care plans during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The MED-LTC virtual consultation service, led by internal medicine specialists, conducted care planning conversations that balanced information-giving/physician guidance with resident autonomy. Consultation included (1) the assessment of co-morbidities, frailty, health trajectory, and capacity; (2) in-depth discussion with decision makers about health status and expected outcomes; and (3) co-development of a care plan. Non-parametric tests and logistic regression determined the significance and factors associated with a change in care plan. Sixty-three residents received virtual consultations to review care goals. Consultation resulted in less aggressive care decisions for 52 residents (83%), while 10 (16%) remained the same. One resident escalated their care plan after a mistaken diagnosis of dementia was corrected. Pre-consultation, 50 residents would have accepted intubation compared to 9 post-consultation. The de-escalation of care plans was associated with dementia, COVID-19 positive status, and advanced frailty. We conclude that during the COVID-19 pandemic, a specialist-led consultation service for frail nursing home residents significantly influenced decisions towards less aggressive care.

Indexed as

care planningCOVID-19frailtynursing homeprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35330035
PMCPMC8950529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.