Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330029›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Different Methods to Improve the Monitoring of Noninvasive Respiratory Support of Patients with Severe Pneumonia/ARDS Due to COVID-19: An Update.

Paolo Pelosi, Roberto Tonelli, Chiara Torregiani, Elisa Baratella, Marco Confalonieri, Denise Battaglini, Alessandro Marchioni, Paola Confalonieri, Enrico Clini, Francesco Salton and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paolo PelosiAnesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Roberto TonelliRespiratory Diseases Unit and Center for Rare Lung Disease, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences SMECHIMAI, University of Modena Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6202-0758
Chiara TorregianiPulmonology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Elisa BaratellaDepartment of Radiology, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1061-9507
Marco ConfalonieriPulmonology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4791-768X
Denise BattagliniAnesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6895-6442
Alessandro MarchioniRespiratory Diseases Unit and Center for Rare Lung Disease, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences SMECHIMAI, University of Modena Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3720-3517
Paola ConfalonieriPulmonology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7284-5016
Enrico CliniRespiratory Diseases Unit and Center for Rare Lung Disease, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences SMECHIMAI, University of Modena Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1515-5094
Francesco SaltonPulmonology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0864-9766
Barbara RuaroPulmonology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-859X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latest guidelines for the hospital care of patients affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory failure have moved towards the widely accepted use of noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS) as opposed to early intubation at the pandemic onset. The establishment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia goes through different pathophysiological phases that partially resemble typical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and have been categorized into different clinical-radiological phenotypes. These can variably benefit on the application of external positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during noninvasive mechanical ventilation, mainly due to variable levels of lung recruitment ability and lung compliance during different phases of the disease. A growing body of evidence suggests that intense respiratory effort producing excessive negative pleural pressure swings (P

Indexed as

ARDScoronavirus diseaseCOVID-19noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS)respiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID35330029
PMCPMC8952765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.