Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329934›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Triple-Negative Apocrine Breast Carcinoma Has Better Prognosis despite Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Taobo Hu, Yiqiang Liu, Jinbo Wu, Xuejiao Lina Hu, Guiyang Zhao, Baosheng Liang, Shu Wang, Mengping Long

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Taobo HuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5124-7167
Yiqiang LiuDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100036, China.
Jinbo WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100032, China.
Xuejiao Lina HuDepartment of Pathology, Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, AK 99501, USA.
Guiyang ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Changping Hospital, Beijing 100192, China.
Baosheng LiangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100080, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3500-0820
Shu WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8651-4795
Mengping LongDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100036, China.
Peking University · CNAlaska Native Medical Center · US

Funding

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation 7202212National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFE0203200National Natural Science Foundation of China 82002979National Natural Science Foundation of China 92059105Peking University BMU2021PYB013Peking University People's Hospital RDX2021-05Peking University People's Hospital RDY2020-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apocrine carcinoma is a rare subtype of invasive ductal breast cancer that shows apocrine differentiation and largely triple-negative immunohistology. Triple-negative breast cancers are known to have more aggressive clinical courses. However, unlike most other subtypes, it is reported that triple-negative apocrine carcinoma (TNAC) has a better prognosis. Due to the scarcity of reported studies, our knowledge regarding its clinical behavior, prognosis and response to therapy is very limited. In this study, we retrospectively retrieved 41 triple-negative apocrine carcinoma cases from our breast cancer database, with an average follow-up of 32.8 months. It was found that TNAC had a poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy but a better prognosis than other nonapocrine types of triple-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, TNAC has a low proliferative nature, as indicated by its low Ki-67 index. An updated analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database showed that chemotherapy did not improve breast-cancer-specific survival in TNAC patients. Our results suggest that TNAC is a special subtype of triple-negative breast cancer with a better short-term prognosis despite poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

androgen receptorinvasive apocrine carcinomaneoadjuvant therapytriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID35329934
PMCPMC8949126
OpenAlexW4225881818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.