Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329895›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Urethral Bulking in the Treatment of Stress and Mixed Female Urinary Incontinence: Results from a Multicenter Cohort and Predictors of Clinical Outcomes.

Alessandro Giammò, Paolo Geretto, Enrico Ammirati, Alberto Manassero, Luisella Squintone, Marco Falcone, Elisabetta Costantini, Giulio Del Popolo, Enrico Finazzi Agrò, Antonella Giannantoni and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Impact of Treatment Setting on Periurethral Bulking.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Alessandro GiammòStruttura Complessa di Neuro-Urologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio CTO-USU, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Paolo GerettoStruttura Complessa di Neuro-Urologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio CTO-USU, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Enrico AmmiratiStruttura Complessa di Neuro-Urologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio CTO-USU, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9162-8845
Alberto ManasseroStruttura Complessa di Neuro-Urologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio CTO-USU, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Luisella SquintoneStruttura Complessa di Neuro-Urologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio CTO-USU, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Marco FalconeStruttura Complessa di Neuro-Urologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio CTO-USU, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Elisabetta CostantiniClinica Urologica, Università di Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.
Giulio Del PopoloNeuro-Urologia, AOU Careggi, 50134 Firenze, Italy.
Enrico Finazzi AgròClinica Urologica, Università di Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy.
Antonella GiannantoniClinica Urologica, Università di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6460-6587
Vincenzo Li MarziClinica Urologica, AOU Careggi, 50134 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6328-7980
Vito ManciniClinica Urologica, Università di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Stefania MuscoNeuro-Urologia, AOU Careggi, 50134 Firenze, Italy.
Mauro PastorelloClinica Urologica, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, 37024 Negrar, Italy.
Donatella PistolesiClinica Urologica, Università di Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Oreste RisiClinica Urologica, Ospedale di Treviglio, 24047 Treviglio, Italy.
Paolo GonteroStruttura Complessa di Neuro-Urologia, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio CTO-USU, 10126 Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to analyze the outcomes of urethral bulking in the treatment of non-neurogenic female stress and mixed urinary incontinence and to assess predictors of clinical outcomes. We retrospectively included all consecutive patients affected by stress or mixed urinary incontinence and treated with urethral bulking. Outcomes were evaluated via the PGI-I questionnaire and the 24-h pad test. Between January 2010 and January 2020, we treated 216 patients (Bulkamid n = 206; Macro-plastique n = 10). The median age at surgery was 66 years (IQR 55−73.75). The median follow-up was 12 months (IQR 12−24). In total, 23.8% of patients were subjected to prior incontinence surgery, 63.8% of patients were affected by genuine stress urinary incontinence, 36.2% reported mixed urinary incontinence, whereas detrusor overactivity was confirmed in only 24.9%. The dry rate was 32.9%; nevertheless, 69.9% of patients declared themselves “very improved” or “improved” (PGI-I1-2). Low complications were observed, mostly classified as Clavien I. After univariate and multivariate analyses, the only statistically significant independent predictor of “dry” outcome was the 24 h pad test, p < 0.001. Urethral bulking could be proposed with more expectations of success in patients with mild urinary incontinence. Patients affected by moderate−severe incontinence are less likely to obtain clinical success; therefore, they should be carefully counselled about clinical expectations before the procedure.

Indexed as

bulkamidfemale stress urinary incontinencemacroplastiqueurethral bulkingurolastic

Identifiers

PMID35329895
PMCPMC8950172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.