Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329875›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Trans-Spinal Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Functional Rehabilitation after Spinal Cord Injury: Review.

Md Akhlasur Rahman, Niraj Singh Tharu, Sylvia M Gustin, Yong-Ping Zheng, Monzurul Alam

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07237165 (Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Pelvic Pain, Comparing Three Groups), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07237165 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Pelvic Pain, Comparing Three Groups: Trans-spinal Stimulation, Ganglionic Stimulation, and Placebo. A Randomized Double-blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2025 to 2029Enrolled60ConditionsChronic Pelvic PainArmsNon-invasive device-based neuromodulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [A simulation study of nerve fiber activation in the lumbar segment under kilohertz-frequency transcutaneously spinal cord stimulation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Md Akhlasur RahmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2693-4103
Niraj Singh TharuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6320-3329
Sylvia M GustinNeuroRecovery Research Hub, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Yong-Ping ZhengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3407-9226
Monzurul AlamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0987-1999
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Hong Kong Polytechnic University UAKB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most debilitating injuries in the world. Complications after SCI, such as respiratory issues, bowel/bladder incontinency, pressure ulcers, autonomic dysreflexia, spasticity, pain, etc., lead to immense suffering, a remarkable reduction in life expectancy, and even premature death. Traditional rehabilitations for people with SCI are often insignificant or ineffective due to the severity and complexity of the injury. However, the recent development of noninvasive electrical neuromodulation treatments to the spinal cord have shed a ray of hope for these individuals to regain some of their lost functions, a reduction in secondary complications, and an improvement in their life quality. For this review, 250 articles were screened and about 150 were included to summarize the two most promising noninvasive spinal cord electrical stimulation methods of SCI rehabilitation treatment, namely, trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) and trans-spinal pulsed current stimulation (tsPCS). Both treatments have demonstrated good success in not only improving the sensorimotor function, but also autonomic functions. Due to the noninvasive nature and lower costs of these treatments, in the coming years, we expect these treatments to be integrated into regular rehabilitation therapies worldwide.

Indexed as

neuromodulationrehabilitationspinal cord injurytranscutaneous electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35329875
PMCPMC8954138
OpenAlexW4220710641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.