Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329844›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Comparison of Trehalose/Hyaluronic Acid (HA) vs. 0.001% Hydrocortisone/HA Eyedrops on Signs and Inflammatory Markers in a Desiccating Model of Dry Eye Disease (DED).

Gloria Astolfi, Luca Lorenzini, Francesca Gobbo, Giuseppe Sarli, Piera Versura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Hormones and dry eye disease.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gloria AstolfiLaboratory for Ocular Surface Analysis and Translational Research, Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2079-5261
Luca LorenziniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.
Francesca GobboDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4082-4675
Giuseppe SarliDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6405-3484
Piera VersuraLaboratory for Ocular Surface Analysis and Translational Research, Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2951-5337
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease where ocular surface inflammation and damage play key etiological roles. PURPOSE: To compare a combination of 3% trehalose (T) and 0.15% hyaluronic acid (HA) (Thealoz duo

methodsThirty 12-week-old C57BL/6 mice were exposed in a controlled-environment chamber as a desiccating stress model of DED for 35 days. At day 14 (T1), administration of 5 µL T or I in the right eye (RE) or NaCl 0.9% in the left eye (LE) started, twice a day. Animals were sacrificed after 7 (T2), 14 (T3), 21 (T4, endpoint) days from the beginning of treatment. Corneal fluorescein staining ratio (Image J), histological and histochemical assessment of ocular surface tissues (goblet cell GC density and characterization -PAS, Alcian blue pH 2.5, pH 1.0, and MUC4 expression-in the superior and inferior conjunctiva), and levels of inflammatory markers HLA-DR, IL-1β and TNF-α in cornea and conjunctiva were measured.

resultsNo animal fully recovered from DED signs at the endpoint. Difference between arms was observed at T3 and T4, with T treated eyes showing a higher corneal damage reduction, PAS-positive GC recovery, lower inflammatory marker expression as compared to the I treated ones.

conclusionsData suggest that 21 days of treatment with T/HA improved signs, GC recovery and inflammatory markers in a DED mouse model, to a greater extent as compared to I/HA. Data suggest that 21 days of treatment with T/HA improved signs, GC recovery and inflammatory markers in a DED mouse model, to a greater extent as compared to I/HA.

Indexed as

controlled-environment chambercorneal damagedesiccation stressdry eye disease (DED)hydrocortisoneinflammatory markersmouse modelmucinssodium hyaluronatetrehalose

Identifiers

PMID35329844
PMCPMC8948919
OpenAlexW4220997727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.