Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329831›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Adherence and Persistence to Biological Drugs for Psoriasis: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Eugenia Piragine, Davide Petri, Alma Martelli, Agata Janowska, Valentina Dini, Marco Romanelli, Vincenzo Calderone, Ersilia Lucenteforte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Use of Biological Drugs for Psoriasis: A Drug-Utilization Study Using Tuscan Administrative Databanks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eugenia PiragineDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6558-3065
Davide PetriDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3690-4007
Alma MartelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2090-7107
Agata JanowskaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Valentina DiniDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Marco RomanelliDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-0141
Vincenzo CalderoneDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Ersilia LucenteforteDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5608-5902

Funding

University of Pisa PRA_2020_57
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the large number of biologics currently available for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, poor adherence and persistence to therapy represent the main issues for both the clinical and economic management of psoriasis. However, the data about adherence and persistence to biologics in psoriasis patients are conflicting. Our aim was to produce summary estimates of adherence and persistence to biologics in adult patients with psoriasis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, searching two databases (PubMed and Embase). Sixty-two records met the inclusion criteria, and a meta-analysis was conducted on fifty-five studies. Overall, the proportion of adherent and persistent patients to biological therapy was 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.73) and 0.63 (0.57-0.68), respectively. The highest proportions were found for ustekinumab, while the lowest ones were found for etanercept. The proportions of adherence and persistence to biological drugs in psoriasis patients are sub-optimal. Notably, both proportions largely differ between drugs, suggesting that a more rational use of biologics might ensure better management of psoriasis.

Indexed as

adherenceanti-IL-12/23anti-IL-17anti-TNF-αbiological drugspersistencepsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID35329831
PMCPMC8953825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.