Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329799›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Selecting the Target Population for Screening of Hepatic Fibrosis in Primary Care Centers in Korea.

Huiyul Park, Eileen L Yoon, Mimi Kim, Seon Cho, Jung-Hwan Kim, Dae Won Jun, Eun-Hee Nah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pharmacotherapy of Liver Fibrosis and Hepatitis: Recent Advances.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Huiyul ParkDepartment of Family Medicine, Myoungji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyangsi 11749, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5044-8688
Eileen L YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-048X
Mimi KimDepartment of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8266-0226
Seon ChoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Health Promotion Research Institute, Seoul 07572, Korea.
Jung-Hwan KimDepartment of Family Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbusi 11749, Korea.
Dae Won JunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2875-6139
Eun-Hee NahDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Health Promotion Research Institute, Seoul 07572, Korea.
Hanyang University · KRKorea Health Promotion Institute · KREulji University · KRMyongji Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening strategies for hepatic fibrosis are heavily focused on patients with fatty liver on sonography in primary care centers. This study aimed to investigate the target population for screening significant hepatic fibrosis in primary care centers. This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study used data from 13 nationwide centers. A total of 5111 subjects who underwent both abdominal sonography and magnetic resonance elastography as part of their health check-up were included. Subjects with viral hepatitis and/or a history of significant alcohol consumption were excluded. Significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis was defined as ≥3.0 kPa and ≥3.6 kPa in the MRE test, respectively. The prevalence of significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis was 7.3% and 1.9%, respectively. Among the subjects with significant hepatic fibrosis, 41.3% did not have fatty liver. Hepatic fibrosis burden increased according to the number of metabolic risk abnormalities. Nearly 70% of subjects with significant hepatic fibrosis also had two or more metabolic risk abnormalities and/or diabetes. However, the prevalence of fibrosis did not differ between the groups with and without fatty liver. The presence of two or more metabolic risk abnormalities was an independent risk factor for significant hepatic fibrosis regardless of the fatty liver. Therefore, in the setting of primary care centers, screening for hepatic fibrosis would better be extended to subjects with metabolically unhealthy status beyond those with fatty liver.

Indexed as

fatty liverhealth check-up cohorthepatic fibrosismagnetic resonance elastographymetabolic abnormality

Identifiers

PMID35329799
PMCPMC8953170
OpenAlexW4221043062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.