Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329621›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Effects of 3-Dimensional Bioprinting Calcium Silicate Cement/Methacrylated Gelatin Scaffold on the Proliferation and Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Dakyung Choi, Manfei Qiu, Yun-Chan Hwang, Won-Mann Oh, Jeong-Tae Koh, Chan Park, Bin-Na Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Bioprinting and biomaterials for dental alveolar tissue regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dakyung ChoiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.
Manfei QiuDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.
Yun-Chan HwangDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.
Won-Mann OhDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.
Jeong-Tae KohDepartment of Pharmacology and Dental Therapeutics, Hard-Tissue Biointerface Research Center, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6279-6487
Chan ParkDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5729-5127
Bin-Na LeeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8017-1835
Chonnam National University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea No. 2019R1F1A1060935, 2019R1A5A2027521 and 2021R1C1C100816511the technology development Program funded by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea) BCRE21210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A calcium silicate cement/methacrylated gelatin (GelMa) scaffold has been applied in tissue engineering; however, the research on its applications in dental tissue regeneration remains lacking. We investigate the effect of this scaffold on human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). hDPSCs were cultured in 3D-printed GelMa and MTA-GelMa scaffolds. Cell adhesion was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy images. Cells were cultured in an osteogenic differentiation medium, which contained a complete medium or α-MEM containing aqueous extracts of the 3D-printd GelMa or MTA-GelMa scaffold with 2% FBS, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid, and 10 nM dexamethasone; cell viability and differentiation were shown by WST-1 assay, Alizarin Red S staining, and alkaline phosphatase staining. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure the mRNA expression of DSPP and DMP-1. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used to determine statistically significant differences, identified at p < 0.05. hDPSCs adhered to both the 3D-printed GelMa and MTA-GelMa scaffolds. There was no statistically significant difference between the GelMa and MTA-GelMa groups and the control group in the cell viability test. Compared with the control group, the 3D-printed MTA-GelMa scaffold promoted the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. The 3D-printed MTA-GelMa scaffold is suitable for the growth of hDPSCs, and the scaffold extracts can better promote odontoblastic differentiation.

Indexed as

bioprintinggelatinmineral trioxide aggregates (MTA)scaffold

Identifiers

PMID35329621
PMCPMC8948861
OpenAlexW4220935552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.