Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329558›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Closer Look at Precision Hard Turning of AISI4340: Multi-Objective Optimization for Simultaneous Low Surface Roughness and High Productivity.

Adel T Abbas, Abdulhamid A Al-Abduljabbar, Ibrahim A Alnaser, Mohamed F Aly, Islam H Abdelgaliel, Ahmed Elkaseer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adel T AbbasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2627-024X
Abdulhamid A Al-AbduljabbarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim A AlnaserDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6325-8410
Mohamed F AlyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt.
Islam H AbdelgalielDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt.
Ahmed ElkaseerDepartment of Production Engineering and Mechanical Design, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Port Fouad 42526, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2500-3617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reports an extended investigation into the precision hard turning of AISI 4340 alloy steel when machined by two different types of inserts: wiper nose and conventional round nose. It provides a closer look at previously published work and aims at determining the optimal process parameters for simultaneously minimizing surface roughness and maximizing productivity. In the mathematical models developed by the authors, surface roughness at different cutting speeds, depths of cut and feed rates is treated as the objective function. Three robust multi-objective techniques, (1) multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), (2) multi-objective Pareto search algorithm (MOPSA) and (3) multi-objective emperor penguin colony algorithm (MOEPCA), were used to determine the optimal turning parameters when either the wiper or the conventional insert is used, and the results were experimentally validated. To investigate the practicality of the optimization algorithms, two turning scenarios were used. These were the machining of the combustion chamber of a gun barrel, first with an average roughness (Ra) of 0.4 µm and then with 0.8 µm, under conditions of high productivity. In terms of the simultaneous achievement of both high surface quality and productivity in precision hard turning of AISI 4340 alloy steel, this work illustrates that MOPSA provides the best optimal solution for the wiper insert case, and MOEPCA results are the best for the conventional insert. Furthermore, the results extracted from Pareto front plots show that the wiper insert is capable of successfully meeting both the requirements of Ra values of 0.4 µm and 0.8 µm and high productivity. However, the conventional insert could not meet the 0.4 µm Ra requirement; the recorded global minimum was Ra = 0.454 µm, which reveals the superiority of the wiper compared to the conventional insert.

Indexed as

AISI 4340 alloy steelmaterial removal ratemulti-objective optimizationsurface integritysurface qualitywiper insert

Identifiers

PMID35329558
PMCPMC8950609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.