Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329419›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Parental Views on the Acceptability and Feasibility of Measurement Tools Used to Assess Movement Behaviour of Pre-School Children: A Qualitative Study.

Sophie M Phillips, Carolyn Summerbell, Kathryn R Hesketh, Sonia Saxena, Frances C Hillier-Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophie M PhillipsDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3HN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4140-8013
Carolyn SummerbellDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3HN, UK.
Kathryn R HeskethMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Sonia SaxenaSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3787-2083
Frances C Hillier-BrownThe Centre for Translational Research in Public Health (Fuse), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/5Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movement behaviours (physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep) are important for the health and development of pre-school children (aged 3-4 years). There is limited qualitative research examining the acceptability and feasibility of tools used to assess movement behaviours in pre-schoolers. This study explored parental views on various measurement tools in three deprived areas in England, UK (West Yorkshire, County Durham and Northumberland). The study consisted of a demonstration of the different tools (accelerometers, a diary and a questionnaire), directly followed by focus group discussions. Three focus group discussions with a total of eleven parents and carers were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed four main themes: (1) importance of contextual information when using any measurement tool (e.g., child illness, capturing different routines); (2) practical issues associated with devices (e.g., aversion to devices being attached directly to the skin of their child; concern of larger devices during sleep time); (3) encouraging children to wear a device (e.g., making devices attractive to children

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesHumansQualitative ResearchSleepacceptabilityfeasibilitymeasurementmovement behaviourspre-school childrenqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35329419
PMCPMC8949363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.