Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329371›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes among Pregnant Women with Diabetes.

Miroslava Gojnic, Jovana Todorovic, Dejana Stanisavljevic, Aleksandra Jotic, Ljiljana Lukic, Tanja Milicic, Nebojsa Lalic, Katarina Lalic, Milica Stoiljkovic, Tamara Stanisavljevic and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Trends of the Prevalence of Pre-gestational Diabetes in 2030 and 2050 in Belgrade Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miroslava GojnicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Jovana TodorovicInstitute of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Dejana StanisavljevicInstitute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra JoticFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Ljiljana LukicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-3513-4434
Tanja MilicicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Nebojsa LalicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Katarina LalicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Milica StoiljkovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Tamara StanisavljevicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandar StefanovicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Katarina StefanovicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Svetlana Vrzic-PetronijevicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Milos PetronijevicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Zorica Terzic-SupicInstitute of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Maja MacuraClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Milan PerovicClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics "NarodniFront", Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Sandra BabicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-7812-9002
Pavle PiperacDepartment for Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 belgrade, Serbia.
Marija JovanovicGeneral Hospital Bor, 19210 Bor, Serbia.
Bijana ParapidClinic for Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Krisitna DoklesticEmergency Department, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Radmila CerovicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Sinisa DjurasevicFaculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-4406-8376
Stefan DugalicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSUniverzitetski Klinički Centar Srbije · RSMining and Metallurgy Institute Bor · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the differences in pregnancy complications, delivery characteristics, and neonatal outcomes between women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study included all pregnant women with diabetes in pregnancy in Belgrade, Serbia, between 2010 and 2020. The total sample consisted of 6737 patients. In total, 1318 (19.6%) patients had T1DM, 138 (2.0%) had T2DM, and 5281 patients (78.4%) had GDM. Multivariate logistic regression with the type of diabetes as an outcome variable showed that patients with T1DM had a lower likelihood of vaginal delivery (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64-0.83), gestational hypertension (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.36-0.62), higher likelihood of chronic hypertension (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.55-2.29),and a higher likelihood ofgestational age at delivery before 37 weeks (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.18-1.63) compared to women with GDM. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients with T2DM had a lower likelihood ofgestational hypertension compared to women with GDM (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.92).Our results indicate that the highest percentage of diabetes in pregnancy is GDM, and the existence of differences in pregnancy complications, childbirth characteristics, and neonatal outcomes are predominantly between women with GDM and women with T1DM.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnant Peoplediabetesin pregnancygestational diabetespre-gestational diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35329371
PMCPMC8953700
OpenAlexW4221034216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.