Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329355›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Development of a Smoke-Free Home Intervention for Families of Babies Admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care.

Caitlin Notley, Tracey J Brown, Linda Bauld, Elaine M Boyle, Paul Clarke, Wendy Hardeman, Richard Holland, Marie Hubbard, Felix Naughton, Amy Nichols and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Caitlin NotleyNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0876-3304
Tracey J BrownNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-5974
Linda BauldUsher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.
Elaine M BoyleDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5038-3148
Paul ClarkeNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6203-7632
Wendy HardemanSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Richard HollandLeicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7HA, UK.
Marie HubbardNeonatal Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
Felix NaughtonSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9790-2796
Amy NicholsNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.
Sophie OrtonDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8577-216X
Michael UssherPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.
Emma WardNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7579-3215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have a disproportionately higher number of parents who smoke tobacco compared to the general population. A baby's NICU admission offers a unique time to prompt behaviour change, and to emphasise the dangerous health risks of environmental tobacco smoke exposure to vulnerable infants. We sought to explore the views of mothers, fathers, wider family members, and healthcare professionals to develop an intervention to promote smoke-free homes, delivered on NICU. This article reports findings of a qualitative interview and focus group study with parents whose infants were in NICU (n = 42) and NICU healthcare professionals (n = 23). Thematic analysis was conducted to deductively explore aspects of intervention development including initiation, timing, components and delivery. Analysis of inductively occurring themes was also undertaken. Findings demonstrated that both parents and healthcare professionals supported the need for intervention. They felt it should be positioned around the promotion of smoke-free homes, but to achieve that end goal might incorporate direct cessation support during the NICU stay, support to stay smoke free (relapse prevention), and support and guidance for discussing smoking with family and household visitors. Qualitative analysis mapped well to an intervention based around the '3As' approach (ask, advise, act). This informed a logic model and intervention pathway.

Indexed as

Intensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersMotivationintervention developmentneonatalrelapse preventionsmoke-free homessmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID35329355
PMCPMC8949360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.