Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329318›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Experiences of SENSory Relearning of the UPPer Limb (SENSUPP) after Stroke and Perceived Effects: A Qualitative Study.

Håkan Carlsson, Ingrid Lindgren, Birgitta Rosén, Anders Björkman, Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, Christina Brogårdh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06962397 (Research on the Effectiveness of the Method of Active Examination of Artificially Simulated Textures Generated by Programmable Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation as a Method of Restoring Sensorimotor Function of the Upper Limbs), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06962397 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Research on the Effectiveness of the Method of Active Examination of Artificially Simulated Textures Generated by Programmable Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation as a Method of Restoring Sensorimotor Function of the Upper Limbs

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal Center of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Russian Federation Ministry of HealthRan2024 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsStroke, Sensorimotor Impairment Affecting the Upper Limb, Sensory Deficit, RehabilitationArmsActive Touch-Based Sensory Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Håkan CarlssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Ingrid LindgrenDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9910-0380
Birgitta RosénDepartment of Translational Medicine-Hand Surgery, Lund University, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.
Anders BjörkmanDepartment of Hand Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hélène Pessah-RasmussenDepartment of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Memory Disorders and Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, 222 41 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-4798
Christina BrogårdhDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9249-9421
Lund University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, it was shown that sensory relearning of the upper limb (SENSUPP) is a promising intervention to improve sensorimotor function after stroke. There is limited knowledge, however, of how participants perceive the training. Here, we explored how persons with sensory impairments in the upper limb experienced the SENSUPP protocol (combined sensory- and motor training and home exercises for 5 weeks) and its effect. Fifteen persons (mean age 59 years; 10 men; >6 months post-stroke) were individually interviewed, and data were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. An overall theme ‘Sensory relearning was meaningful and led to improved ability to perform daily hand activities’ and two categories with six subcategories emerged. The outpatient training was perceived as meaningful, although the exercises were demanding and required concentration. Support from the therapist was helpful and training in small groups appreciated. The home training was challenging due to lack of support, time, and motivation. Small improvements in sensory function were perceived, whereas increased movement control and ability in performing daily hand activities were reported. In conclusion, the SENSUPP protocol is meaningful and beneficial in improving the functioning of the UL in chronic stroke. Improving compliance to the home training, regular follow-ups, and an exercise diary are recommended.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationExercise TherapyFemaleHandHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremityqualitative studysensory functionsensory relearningstrokeupper limb

Identifiers

PMID35329318
PMCPMC8955037
OpenAlexW4220699045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.