Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329245›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The IWH-BEAT Questionnaire Validation.

Mario Toledo, Humberto Charles-Leija, Carlos Gustavo Castro, Iván Guerrero, Rosalinda Ballesteros-Valdés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Meaningful Work, Happiness at Work, and Turnover Intentions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario ToledoInstitute for Wellbeing and Happiness, Universidad Tecmilenio, Monterrey 64909, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5549-9396
Humberto Charles-LeijaInstitute for Wellbeing and Happiness, Universidad Tecmilenio, Monterrey 64909, Mexico.
Carlos Gustavo CastroInstitute for Wellbeing and Happiness, Universidad Tecmilenio, Monterrey 64909, Mexico.
Iván GuerreroInstitute for Wellbeing and Happiness, Universidad Tecmilenio, Monterrey 64909, Mexico.
Rosalinda Ballesteros-ValdésInstitute for Wellbeing and Happiness, Universidad Tecmilenio, Monterrey 64909, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive Psychology has been devoted to enhancing well-being within organizations during the first two decades of the current millennium. Unfortunately, little data is available on current assessment related to positive psychology practices in the workplace. Therefore, to assess organizational well-being in a valid and reliable way, a new scale has been created and validated by the Institute for Wellbeing and Happiness at Tecmilenio University in Mexico: the BEAT Questionnaire whose main contribution to previous models is the element of meaningful work. EFA and CFA were carried out to determine and confirm the scale's structure; internal consistency tests were performed too; additionally, convergence with measures of engagement, labor resources, and worker relations were also confirmed, and discriminant validity was tested by comparing associations with job search intentions and negative relationships in the workplace, yielding an instrument with four clearly defined latent dimensions, composed by 24 highly consistent items, convergent with three other valid and reliable scales. All procedures complied with statistical requirements, delivering a valid and reliable instrument for measuring well-being in the workplace.

Indexed as

WorkplaceHumansMexicoPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesleadershipmeaningful workorganizational well-beingpositive environmentswell-being assessment

Identifiers

PMID35329245
PMCPMC8953982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.