Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35329211›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

FOODLIT-Trial: Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Digital Intervention to Promote Food Literacy and Sustainability Behaviours in Adults Using the Health Action Process Approach and the Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Raquel Rosas, Filipa Pimenta, Isabel Leal, Ralf Schwarzer

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analysing the behaviour change techniques in an effective food literacy program to inform future program design.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raquel RosasWJCR-William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal.
Filipa PimentaWJCR-William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal.
Isabel LealWJCR-William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal.
Ralf SchwarzerDepartment of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0069-3826

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/128528/2017Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UID/PSI/04810/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary quality and sustainability are central matters to the international community, emphasised by the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. To promote healthier and more sustainable food-related practices, the protocol of a web-based intervention to enhance adults' food literacy is presented. The FOODLIT-Trial is a two-arm, parallel, experimental, and single-blinded randomised controlled trial delivered over 11 weeks. Based on the Food Literacy Wheel framework and supported by the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) and the Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy, weekly content with customised behaviour change techniques (experimental group) is hypothesised to be more effective to promote food behaviour change when compared to a single-time and non-customised delivery of food-related international guidelines, with no theoretically informed approaches (comparison group). Primary outcome is food literacy, including food-related knowledge, skills, and behaviours, assessed with the FOODLIT-Tool; a secondary outcome includes psychological mechanisms that efficaciously predict change in participants' food literacy, measured with HAPA-driven items. Enlisted through online sources, participants will be assessed across five time points (baseline, post-intervention, and 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-ups, i.e., T0-T4). A randomisation check will be conducted, analyses will follow an intention-to-treat approach, and linear two-level models within- (T0-T4) and between-level (nested in participants) will be computed, together with a longitudinal mediation analysis. If effective, the FOODLIT-Trial will provide for a multidimensional and cost-effective intervention to enable healthier and more sustainable food practices over the long term.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyAdultBehavior TherapyFoodHumansPandemicsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbehaviour changeBehaviour Change Techniques TaxonomyCOVID-19food literacyHealth Action Process Approachrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID35329211
PMCPMC8950592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.