Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328923›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Well-Being of the German Adult Population Measured with the WHO-5 over Different Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis within the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring Study (COSMO).

Fang-Yi Tsai, Hannah Schillok, Michaela Coenen, Christina Merkel, Caroline Jung-Sievers, On Behalf Of The Cosmo Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health and Care Dependency of Older Adults in Dresden, Germany: Results from the LAB60+ Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fang-Yi TsaiChair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology-IBE, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Hannah SchillokChair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology-IBE, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6160-2847
Michaela CoenenChair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology-IBE, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7492-7907
Christina MerkelFederal Centre for Health Education (BZgA), Maar-Weg 149-161, 50825 Cologne, Germany.
Caroline Jung-SieversChair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology-IBE, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377 Munich, Germany.
On Behalf Of The Cosmo Study Group
Federal Centre for Health Education · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate factors associated with the subjective well-being (SWB) and suspected depression measured with WHO-5 among German adults during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Survey data were analyzed from the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) study, which collected data from 972, 1013, and 973 participants in time point 1 (19-20 May 2020), time point 2 (15-16 September 2020), and time point 3 (21-22 December 2020), respectively. Descriptive analyses and logistic regression analyses to identify the factors associated with suspected depression (WHO-5 ≤ 50) were conducted. Data showed that the mean WHO-5 scores in three time points were 56.17, 57.27, and 53.93, respectively. The risk of suspected depression was increased by about 1.5 times for females, 2.5-3 times among 18-24 year-olds compared to ages above 65 years, 1.5 times for singles, 2 times for those with chronic illnesses, and 2-3 times for people living in poverty. The main study findings show that German adult SWB is lower than pre-pandemic reference values. Special focus should be placed on vulnerable groups, such as females, younger persons, and people living in poverty who are most prone to a reduction in SWB and therefore suspected depression.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedFemaleHumansPandemicsPovertySurveys and QuestionnairesWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19depressionmental healthpsychological distressWHO-5

Identifiers

PMID35328923
PMCPMC8955618
OpenAlexW4220662995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.