Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328915›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Susceptibility Analysis of Geohazards in the Longmen Mountain Region after the Wenchuan Earthquake.

Shuai Li, Zhongyun Ni, Yinbing Zhao, Wei Hu, Zhenrui Long, Haiyu Ma, Guoli Zhou, Yuhao Luo, Chuntao Geng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Refined Zoning of Landslide Susceptibility: A Case Study in Enshi County, Hubei, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Forces of NDVI in China's Giant Panda National Park.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuai LiCollege of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Zhongyun NiCollege of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7729-6610
Yinbing ZhaoCollege of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2011-1272
Wei HuCollege of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Zhenrui LongSichuan Research Institute of Ecological Restoration of Land Space and Geohazard Prevention and Control, Sichuan Provincial Department of Natural Resources, Chengdu 610063, China.
Haiyu MaCollege of Information, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Guoli ZhouCollege of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Yuhao LuoCollege of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Chuntao GengCollege of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multitemporal geohazard susceptibility analysis can not only provide reliable results but can also help identify the differences in the mechanisms of different elements under different temporal and spatial backgrounds, so as to better accurately prevent and control geohazards. Here, we studied the 12 counties (cities) that were severely affected by the Wenchuan earthquake of 12 May 2008. Our study was divided into four time periods: 2008, 2009-2012, 2013, and 2014-2017. Common geohazards in the study area, such as landslides, collapses and debris flows, were taken into account. We constructed a geohazard susceptibility index evaluation system that included topography, geology, land cover, meteorology, hydrology, and human activities. Then we used a random forest model to study the changes in geohazard susceptibility during the Wenchuan earthquake, the following ten years, and its driving mechanisms. We had four main findings. (1) The susceptibility of geohazards from 2008 to 2017 gradually increased and their spatial distribution was significantly correlated with the main faults and rivers. (2) The Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault, the western section of the Jiangyou-Dujiangyan Fault, and the Minjiang and Fujiang rivers were highly susceptible to geohazards, and changes in geohazard susceptibility mainly occurred along the Pingwu-Qingchuan Fault, the eastern section of the Jiangyou-Dujiangyan Fault, and the riparian areas of the Mianyuan River, Zagunao River, Tongkou River, Baicao River, and other secondary rivers. (3) The relative contribution of topographic factors to geohazards in the four different periods was stable, geological factors slowly decreased, and meteorological and hydrological factors increased. In addition, the impact of land cover in 2008 was more significant than during other periods, and the impact of human activities had an upward trend from 2008 to 2017. (4) Elevation and slope had significant topographical effects, coupled with the geological environmental effects of engineering rock groups and faults, and river-derived effects, which resulted in a spatial aggregation of geohazard susceptibility. We attributed the dynamic changes in the areas that were highly susceptible to geohazards around the faults and rivers to the changes in the intensity of earthquakes and precipitation in different periods.

Indexed as

EarthquakesLandslidesChinaGeologyHumansHydrologyRiversgeohazard susceptibilityLongmenshan fault zonerandom forest modelsuperposition effect

Identifiers

PMID35328915
PMCPMC8953272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.