Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328877›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Nutritional Quality, Environmental Impact and Cost of Ultra-Processed Foods: A UK Food-Based Analysis.

Magaly Aceves-Martins, Ruth L Bates, Leone C A Craig, Neil Chalmers, Graham Horgan, Bram Boskamp, Baukje de Roos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magaly Aceves-MartinsThe Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9441-142X
Ruth L BatesThe Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3685-1996
Leone C A CraigInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
Neil ChalmersThe Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
Graham HorganBiomathematics & Statistics Scotland, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6048-1374
Bram BoskampBiomathematics & Statistics Scotland, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK.
Baukje de RoosThe Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2750-3914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food-based analyses of the healthiness, environmental sustainability and affordability of processed and ultra-processed foods are lacking. This paper aimed to determine how ultra-processed and processed foods compare to fresh and minimally processed foods in relation to nutritional quality, greenhouse gas emissions and cost on the food and food group level. Data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey nutrient databank year 11 (2018/2019) were used for this analysis. Median and bootstrapped medians of nutritional quality (NRF8.3 index), greenhouse gas emissions (gCO2-equivalents) and cost (in GBP) were compared across processing categories. An optimal score based on the medians was created to identify the most nutritional, sustainable, and affordable options across processing categories. On a per 100 kcal basis, ultra-processed and processed foods had a lower nutritional quality, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and were cheaper than minimally processed foods, regardless of their total fat, salt and/or sugar content. The most nutritious, environmentally friendly, and affordable foods were generally lower in total fat, salt, and sugar, irrespective of processing level. The high variability in greenhouse gas emissions and cost across food groups and processing levels offer opportunities for food swaps representing the healthiest, greenest, and most affordable options.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeGreenhouse GasesCarbohydratesDietEnvironmentFast FoodsFood HandlingNutritive ValueSugarsUnited KingdomCarbohydratesGreenhouse GasesSugarscostfoodNDNSNOVANRF8.3sustainability

Identifiers

PMID35328877
PMCPMC8948822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.