Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328860›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Precarious Work as Risk Factor for 5-Year Increase in Depressive Symptoms.

Yucel Demiral, Tobias Ihle, Uwe Rose, Paul Maurice Conway, Hermann Burr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yucel DemiralDepartment of Public Health, Medical Faculty, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir 35340, Turkey.
Tobias IhleFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), 10317 Berlin, Germany.
Uwe RoseFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), 10317 Berlin, Germany.
Paul Maurice ConwayDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hermann BurrFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), 10317 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim was to investigate the longitudinal relationship between precarious work and depressive symptoms in a representative cohort of employees in Germany.

methodsIn the German Study on Mental Health at Work (S-MGA) (

resultsAmong men, job insecurity (OR: 2.47; 95% 95% CI: 1.37-4.48) and low wage (3.79; 1.64-8.72) at baseline were significantly associated with depressive symptoms at follow-up. Among women, indicators of precarious work were not associated with depressive symptoms at follow-up. Among men, a cumulative exposure index of precarious work was significantly associated with the development of depressive symptoms (one indicator: 1.84; 0.94-3.60, ≥two indicators: 7.65; 3.30-17.73). This index was not associated with depressive symptoms among women. The population attributable fraction of precarious work due to depressive symptoms among men was approximately 30%.

conclusionsAmong employees in Germany, precarious work seems to be a risk factor for the subsequent development of depressive symptoms among men, but not among women. Research on precarious employment in different countries is needed.

Indexed as

DepressionEmploymentFemaleGermanyHumansMaleRisk FactorsUnemploymentmental healthnon-standard workprecarious workprospective analyses

Identifiers

PMID35328860
PMCPMC8949946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.