Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328838›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Cross-Country Adaptation of a Psychological Flexibility Measure: The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes.

Ambra Mara Giovannetti, Jana Pöttgen, Elisenda Anglada, Rebeca Menéndez, Jürgen Hoyer, Andrea Giordano, Kenneth Ian Pakenham, Ingrid Galán, Alessandra Solari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cross-cultural validity and reliability of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) in people with multiple sclerosis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ambra Mara GiovannettiUnit of Neuroepidemiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Jana PöttgenInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Elisenda AngladaCentre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Rebeca MenéndezCentre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Jürgen HoyerInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, 01187 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1697-6732
Andrea GiordanoUnit of Neuroepidemiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Kenneth Ian PakenhamSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8653-4593
Ingrid GalánCentre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Alessandra SolariUnit of Neuroepidemiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9930-7579
Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya · ESFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITTechnische Universität Dresden · DEThe University of Queensland · AUUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) processes (CompACT) is a 23-item self-report questionnaire assessing psychological flexibility, which is the overarching construct underpinning the ACT framework. We conducted a two-phase project to develop validated versions of the CompACT in three languages: phase 1-cross-cultural adaptation; and phase 2-psychometric validation of the questionnaire for use in Italy, Germany and Spain. This article focuses on the first phase.

methodsWe translated and culturally adapted the CompACT in the three target languages, following the ISPOR TCA Task Force guidelines. The process was overseen by a translation panel (three translators, at least two multiple sclerosis (MS) researchers and a lay person), ACT experts and clinicians from the research team of each country and the original CompACT developers. We debriefed the new questionnaire versions via face-to-face interviews with a minimum of four adults from the general population (GP) and four adults with MS in each country.

resultsThe translation-adaptation process went smoothly in the three countries, with some items (7 in Italy, 4 in Germany, 6 in Spain) revised after feedback from ACT experts. Cognitive debriefing showed that the CompACT was deemed easy to understand and score in each target country by both GP and MS adults.

conclusionsThe Italian, German and Spanish versions of the CompACT have semantic, conceptual and normative equivalence to the original scale and good content validity. Our findings are informative for researchers adapting the CompACT and other self-reported outcome measures into multiple languages and cultures.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyMultiple SclerosisAdultHumansLanguagePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingTranslationsCompACTcultural adaptationlinguistic validationoutcome measurespsychological flexibility

Identifiers

PMID35328838
PMCPMC8953951
OpenAlexW4220758764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.