Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328578›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Transmembrane Cyclic Peptide Nanotubes Using Classical Force Fields, Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning, and Hydrogen Isotope Exchange Methods: A Critical Comparison.

Daniel Conde, Pablo F Garrido, Martín Calvelo, Ángel Piñeiro, Rebeca Garcia-Fandino

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel CondeCenter for Research in Biological Chemistry and Molecular Materials, Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Pablo F GarridoDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Facultade de Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Martín CalveloCenter for Research in Biological Chemistry and Molecular Materials, Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7114-1781
Ángel PiñeiroDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Facultade de Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Rebeca Garcia-FandinoCenter for Research in Biological Chemistry and Molecular Materials, Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Ministerio) RTI2018-098795-A-I00, and PID2019-111327GB-I00, RYC-2016-20335Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia POCI-01-0145-30579Xunta de Galicia ED431F 2020/05, ED431C 2017/25, and Centro singular de investigación de Galicia accredita-tion 2016-2019, ED431G/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-assembled cyclic peptide nanotubes with alternating

Indexed as

NanotubesNanotubes, PeptideHydrogenIsotopesMolecular Dynamics SimulationPeptides, CyclicHydrogenIsotopesNanotubes, PeptidePeptides, Cyclicantimicrobial peptidescyclic peptidesforce fieldhydrogen isotope exchangehydrogen mass repartitioningmolecular dynamicsself-assembled peptide nanotubes

Identifiers

PMID35328578
PMCPMC8951607
OpenAlexW4220972822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.