Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328380›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Tissue-Specific Methylation Biosignatures for Monitoring Diseases: An In Silico Approach.

Makrina Karaglani, Maria Panagopoulou, Ismini Baltsavia, Paraskevi Apalaki, Theodosis Theodosiou, Ioannis Iliopoulos, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Ekaterini Chatzaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pan-Cancer Computational Analysis of RKIP (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prediction and Ranking of Biomarkers UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Makrina KaraglaniLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Maria PanagopoulouLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Ismini BaltsaviaDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Crete, GR-71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Paraskevi ApalakiLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Theodosis TheodosiouLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Ioannis IliopoulosDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Crete, GR-71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Ioannis TsamardinosJADBio Gnosis DA S.A., Science and Technology Park of Crete, GR-70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Ekaterini ChatzakiLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5832-4257

Funding

RESEARCH - CREATE - INNOVATE T1EDK-00940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue-specific gene methylation events are key to the pathogenesis of several diseases and can be utilized for diagnosis and monitoring. Here, we established an in silico pipeline to analyze high-throughput methylome datasets to identify specific methylation fingerprints in three pathological entities of major burden, i.e., breast cancer (BrCa), osteoarthritis (OA) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Differential methylation analysis was conducted to compare tissues/cells related to the pathology and different types of healthy tissues, revealing Differentially Methylated Genes (DMGs). Highly performing and low feature number biosignatures were built with automated machine learning, including: (1) a five-gene biosignature discriminating BrCa tissue from healthy tissues (AUC 0.987 and precision 0.987), (2) three equivalent OA cartilage-specific biosignatures containing four genes each (AUC 0.978 and precision 0.986) and (3) a four-gene pancreatic β-cell-specific biosignature (AUC 0.984 and precision 0.995). Next, the BrCa biosignature was validated using an independent ccfDNA dataset showing an AUC and precision of 1.000, verifying the biosignature's applicability in liquid biopsy. Functional and protein interaction prediction analysis revealed that most DMGs identified are involved in pathways known to be related to the studied diseases or pointed to new ones. Overall, our data-driven approach contributes to the maximum exploitation of high-throughput methylome readings, helping to establish specific disease profiles to be applied in clinical practice and to understand human pathology.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOsteoarthritisDNA MethylationEpigenomeFemaleHumansbreast cancerdiabetesliquid biopsymachine learningmethylationmicroarraysmodelosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID35328380
PMCPMC8952417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.