Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328320›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Intracranial Flow Volume Estimation in Patients with Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion.

Piotr Kaszczewski, Michał Elwertowski, Jerzy Leszczyński, Tomasz Ostrowski, Joanna Kaszczewska, Zbigniew Gałązka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Internal Carotid Stenosis Treatment on Cerebral Blood Flow Volume: A Comparative Study between Preoperative and Postoperative Values.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piotr KaszczewskiDepartment of General, Endocrine and Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8461-1049
Michał ElwertowskiDepartment of General, Endocrine and Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland.
Jerzy LeszczyńskiDepartment of General, Endocrine and Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland.
Tomasz OstrowskiDepartment of General, Endocrine and Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland.
Joanna KaszczewskaDepartment of General, Endocrine and Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland.
Zbigniew GałązkaDepartment of General, Endocrine and Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Carotid artery occlusion (CAO) in population studies has a reported prevalence of about 6 per 100,000 people; however, the data may be underestimated. CAO carries a significant risk of stroke. Up to 15% of large artery infractions may be secondary to the CAO, and in 27−38% of patients, ischaemic stroke is a first presentation of the disease. The presence of sufficient and well-developed collateral circulation has a protective influence, being a good prognostic factor in patients with carotid artery disease, both chronic and acute. Understanding the mechanisms and role of collateral circulation may be very important in the risk stratification of such patients. (2) Materials and Methods: This study included 46 patients (mean age: 70.5 ± 6 years old; 15 female, mean age 68.5 ± 3.8 years old and 31 male, mean age 71.5 ± 6.7 years old) with unilateral or bilateral ICA occlusion. In all patients, a Doppler ultrasound (DUS) examination, measuring blood flow volume in the internal carotid artery (ICA), external carotid artery (ECA), and vertebral artery (VA), was performed. The cerebral blood flow (CBF) was compared to the previously reported CBF values in the healthy population >65 years old. (3) Results: In comparison with CBF values in the healthy population, three subgroups with CBF changes were identified among patients with ICA occlusion: patients with significant volumetric flow compensation (CBF higher than average + standard deviation for healthy population of the same age), patients with flow similar to the healthy population (average ± standard deviation), and patients without compensation (CBF lower than the average-standard deviation for healthy population). The percentage of patients with significant volumetric flow compensation tend to rise with increasing age, while a simultaneous decline was observed in the group without compensation. The percentage of patients with flow similar to the healthy population remained relatively unchanged. ICA played the most important role in volumetric flow compensation in patients with CAO; however, the relative increase in flow in the ICA was smaller than that in the ECA and VA. Compensatory increased flow was observed in about 50% of all patent extracranial arteries and was more frequently observed in ipsilateral vessels than in contralateral ones, in both the ECA and the VA. In patients with CAO, there was no decrease in CBF, ICA, ECA, and VA flow volume with increasing age. (4) Conclusions: Volumetric flow compensation may play an important predictive role in patients with CAO.

Indexed as

carotid artery diseasecarotid occlusioncerebral blood flowcerebrovascular reserveDoppler ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35328320
PMCPMC8947284
OpenAlexW4220773786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.