ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Value of
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved detection of local tumor progression after ablation or resection of colorectal liver metastases using [European radiology · 2026Article
- Tumor ablation: emerging uses, challenges, and strategic implementation. A green paper by the Network of Expertise in Cancer (JANE-2), High Tech Medical Resources, network on Physical Methods of Tumor Ablation.Radiology and oncology · 2026Review
- Future directions of image-guided thermal ablation in colorectal cancer lung oligometastases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Can non-tumorous liver tissue serve as a reliable reference measure for [EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Clinical and dosimetric considerations for yttrium-90 glass microspheres radioembolization of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic colorectal carcinoma, and metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- A novel nomogram on predicting extrahepatic metastasis in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis for selective application ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Deciphering Tumor Response: The Role of Fluoro-18-d-Glucose Uptake in Evaluating Targeted Therapies with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Imaging Considerations before and after Liver-Directed Locoregional Treatments for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- PET/CT in assessment of colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive review with emphasis onClinical & experimental metastasis · 2023Review
- Article
- Evaluation of patients via colonoscopy who underwent positron emission tomography/computerized tomography due to colon involvement.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Up to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer either have synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) or develop CRLM over the course of their disease. Surgery and thermal ablation are the most common local treatment options of choice. Despite development and improvement in local treatment options, (local) recurrence remains a significant clinical problem. Many different imaging modalities can be used in the follow-up after treatment of CRLM, lacking evidence-based international consensus on the modality of choice. In this systematic review, we evaluated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.