ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics of liver virtual non-contrast images from three-phase dynamic CT obtained with second-generation dual-layer spectral CT.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Conspicuity and characterization of pre-selected hypodense hepatic lesions in pancreatic cancer patients: limited clinical value of dual-energy portal phase CT.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Dual-energy CT liver fat fraction as prognostic imaging biomarker in critically ill patients.European radiology · 2026Article
- Photon-counting CT in cancer radiotherapy: technological advances and clinical benefits.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Mean liver density independently predicts therapeutic response and liver-related mortality in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Comparing Different Methods for the Diagnosis of Liver Steatosis: What Are the Best Diagnostic Tools?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- QuLF-CT: A Radiomics-Based Tool for Quantification of Liver Fat Fraction on Cardiac CT.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- What to Expect (and What Not) from Dual-Energy CT Imaging Now and in the Future?Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Hepatic fat quantification in dual-layer computed tomography using a three-material decomposition algorithm.European radiology · 2024Article
- Fatty-marrow transformation following radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer detected using dual-energy computed tomography: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and liver biopsy to assess hepatic steatosis in obesity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Principles and Applications of Dual-Layer Spectral CT in Gastrointestinal Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Spectral CT: Current Liver Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Hepatic Fat Quantification with the Multi-Material Decomposition Algorithm by Using Low-Dose Non-Contrast Material-Enhanced Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in a Prospectively Enrolled Cohort.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We assessed the correlation between liver fat percentage using dual-energy CT (DECT) and Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements in contrast and non-contrast CT. This study included 177 patients in two patient groups: Group A (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.