Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328251›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Fully Automated Thrombus Segmentation on CT Images of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Mahsa Mojtahedi, Manon Kappelhof, Elena Ponomareva, Manon Tolhuisen, Ivo Jansen, Agnetha A E Bruggeman, Bruna G Dutra, Lonneke Yo, Natalie LeCouffe, Jan W Hoving and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Acute ischemic stroke patient factors associated with poor outcomes in patients with favorable collaterals and successful thrombectomy.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mahsa MojtahediDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1860-1114
Manon KappelhofDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elena PonomarevaNicolab, 1105 BP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Manon TolhuisenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-1117
Ivo JansenNicolab, 1105 BP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnetha A E BruggemanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6873-2545
Bruna G DutraDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lonneke YoDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Natalie LeCouffeDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan W HovingDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3310-3973
Henk van VoorstDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Josje BrouwerDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nerea Arrarte TerrerosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-7508
Praneeta KonduriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederick J A MeijerDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud UMC, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5921-639X
Auke AppelmanMedical Imaging Center, UMC Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kilian M TreurnietResearch Bureau of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonathan M CoutinhoDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvo RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim van ZwamDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-7056
Diederik DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC UMC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Efstratios GavvesInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart J EmmerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk MarqueringDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thrombus imaging characteristics are associated with treatment success and functional outcomes in stroke patients. However, assessing these characteristics based on manual annotations is labor intensive and subject to observer bias. Therefore, we aimed to create an automated pipeline for consistent and fast full thrombus segmentation. We used multi-center, multi-scanner datasets of anterior circulation stroke patients with baseline NCCT and CTA for training (n = 228) and testing (n = 100). We first found the occlusion location using StrokeViewer LVO and created a bounding box around it. Subsequently, we trained dual modality U-Net based convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to segment the thrombus inside this bounding box. We experimented with: (1) U-Net with two input channels for NCCT and CTA, and U-Nets with two encoders where (2) concatenate, (3) add, and (4) weighted-sum operators were used for feature fusion. Furthermore, we proposed a dynamic bounding box algorithm to adjust the bounding box. The dynamic bounding box algorithm reduces the missed cases but does not improve Dice. The two-encoder U-Net with a weighted-sum feature fusion shows the best performance (surface Dice 0.78, Dice 0.62, and 4% missed cases). Final segmentation results have high spatial accuracies and can therefore be used to determine thrombus characteristics and potentially benefit radiologists in clinical practice.

Indexed as

convolutional neural network (CNN)CT angiographyCT imagingischemic strokesegmentationthrombusU-Net

Identifiers

PMID35328251
PMCPMC8947334
OpenAlexW4221029947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.