ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Fast, Accurate, and Robust T2 Mapping of Articular Cartilage by Neural Networks.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-based segmentation and quantitative assessment of knee cartilage in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Bayesian Graphical Models for Multiscale Inference in Medical Image-Based Joint Degeneration Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Improved quantitative parameter estimation for prostate TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- MR-Imaging in Osteoarthritis: Current Standard of Practice and Future Outlook.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Sodium Relaxation Times and Concentrations in the Achilles Tendon Using MRI.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Lorentzian-Corrected Apparent Exchange-Dependent Relaxation (LAREX) Ω-Plot Analysis-An Adaptation for qCEST in a Multi-Pool System: Comprehensive In Silico, In Situ, and In Vivo Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For T2 mapping, the underlying mono-exponential signal decay is traditionally quantified by non-linear Least-Squares Estimation (LSE) curve fitting, which is prone to outliers and computationally expensive. This study aimed to validate a fully connected neural network (NN) to estimate T2 relaxation times and to assess its performance versus LSE fitting methods. To this end, the NN was trained and tested in silico on a synthetic dataset of 75 million signal decays. Its quantification error was comparatively evaluated against three LSE methods, i.e., traditional methods without any modification, with an offset, and one with noise correction. Following in-situ acquisition of T2 maps in seven human cadaveric knee joint specimens at high and low signal-to-noise ratios, the NN and LSE methods were used to estimate the T2 relaxation times of the manually segmented patellofemoral cartilage. In-silico modeling at low signal-to-noise ratio indicated significantly lower quantification error for the NN (by medians of 6−33%) than for the LSE methods (p < 0.001). These results were confirmed by the in-situ measurements (medians of 10−35%). T2 quantification by the NN took only 4 s, which was faster than the LSE methods (28−43 s). In conclusion, NNs provide fast, accurate, and robust quantification of T2 relaxation times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.