Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328224›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Dual-Energy CT, Virtual Non-Calcium Bone Marrow Imaging of the Spine: An AI-Assisted, Volumetric Evaluation of a Reference Cohort with 500 CT Scans.

Philipp Fervers, Florian Fervers, Mathilda Weisthoff, Miriam Rinneburger, David Zopfs, Robert Peter Reimer, Gregor Pahn, Jonathan Kottlors, David Maintz, Simon Lennartz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp FerversDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Florian FerversFraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation (IOSB), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Mathilda WeisthoffDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Miriam RinneburgerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
David ZopfsDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Robert Peter ReimerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Gregor PahnPhilips CT Clinical Science, 22335 Hamburg, Germany.
Jonathan KottlorsDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5021-6895
David MaintzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Simon LennartzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Thorsten PersigehlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Nils Große HokampDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-0487
University Hospital Cologne · DEFraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation · DEPhilips (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual non-calcium (VNCa) images from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) have shown high potential to diagnose bone marrow disease of the spine, which is frequently disguised by dense trabecular bone on conventional CT. In this study, we aimed to define reference values for VNCa bone marrow images of the spine in a large-scale cohort of healthy individuals. DECT was performed after resection of a malignant skin tumor without evidence of metastatic disease. Image analysis was fully automated and did not require specific user interaction. The thoracolumbar spine was segmented by a pretrained convolutional neuronal network. Volumetric VNCa data of the spine's bone marrow space were processed using the maximum, medium, and low calcium suppression indices. Histograms of VNCa attenuation were created for each exam and suppression setting. We included 500 exams of 168 individuals (88 female, patient age 61.0 ± 15.9). A total of 8298 vertebrae were segmented. The attenuation histograms' overlap of two consecutive exams, as a measure for intraindividual consistency, yielded a median of 0.93 (IQR: 0.88-0.96). As our main result, we provide the age- and sex-specific bone marrow attenuation profiles of a large-scale cohort of individuals with healthy trabecular bone structure as a reference for future studies. We conclude that artificial-intelligence-supported, fully automated volumetric assessment is an intraindividually robust method to image the spine's bone marrow using VNCa data from DECT.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebone marrowspinetomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID35328224
PMCPMC8947045
OpenAlexW4220976573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.