Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328183›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Preoperative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Differentiation between Low and High Grade Meningiomas: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yueh-Ting Tsai, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Yun-Ju Shih, Sher-Wei Lim, Cheng-Chun Yang, Yu-Ting Kuo, Jeon-Hor Chen, Ching-Chung Ko

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yueh-Ting TsaiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710, Taiwan.
Kuo-Chuan HungDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4507-8085
Yun-Ju ShihDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710, Taiwan.
Sher-Wei LimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Chiali, Tainan 722, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chun YangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710, Taiwan.
Yu-Ting KuoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710, Taiwan.
Jeon-Hor ChenDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Ching-Chung KoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0721-9606
Chi Mei Medical Center · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TWMin-Hwei College of Health Care Management · TWNational Sun Yat-sen University · TWUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Chi Mei Medical Center CMFHR 11105Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 109-2314-B-384-010-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The meta-analysis aimed to compare the preoperative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between low-grade meningiomas (LGMs) and high-grade meningiomas (HGMs). Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases were screened up to January 2022 for studies investigating the ADC values of meningiomas. The study endpoint was the reported ADC values for LGMs and HGMs. Further subgroup analyses between 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners, ADC threshold values, ADC in different histological LGMs, and correlation coefficients (r) between ADC and Ki-67 were also performed. The quality of studies was evaluated by the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). A χ2-based test of homogeneity was performed using Cochran’s Q statistic and inconsistency index (I2). Twenty-five studies with a total of 1552 meningiomas (1102 LGMs and 450 HGMs) were included. The mean ADC values (×10−3 mm2/s) were 0.92 and 0.79 for LGMs and HGMs, respectively. Compared with LGMs, significantly lower mean ADC values for HGMs were observed with a pooled difference of 0.13 (p < 0.00001). The results were consistent in both 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners. For ADC threshold values, pooled sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 82%, and AUC of 0.84 are obtained for differentiation between LGMs and HGMs. The mean ADC (×10−3 mm2/s) in different histological LGMs ranged from 0.87 to 1.22. Correlation coefficients (r) of mean ADC and Ki-67 ranged from −0.29 to −0.61. Preoperative ADC values are a useful tool for differentiating between LGMs and HGMs. Results of this study provide valuable information for planning treatments in meningiomas.

Indexed as

ADCDWImeningiomameta-analysisMRI

Identifiers

PMID35328183
PMCPMC8947055
OpenAlexW4220966319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.