Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328163›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Post-Acquisition Hyperpolarized

Caitlin V McCowan, Duncan Salmon, Jingzhe Hu, Shivanand Pudakalakatti, Nicholas Whiting, Jennifer S Davis, Daniel D Carson, Niki M Zacharias, Pratip K Bhattacharya, Mary C Farach-Carson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin V McCowanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0989-6187
Duncan SalmonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5918-5140
Jingzhe HuDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Shivanand PudakalakattiDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6210-2104
Nicholas WhitingDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jennifer S DavisDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9456-1682
Daniel D CarsonDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Niki M ZachariasDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Pratip K BhattacharyaDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0625-252X
Mary C Farach-CarsonDepartment of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4526-3088
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USRice University · US

Funding

Circulating Biomarkers and Imaging for Early Detection of Pancreatic CancerU01CA214263 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI EUGENE J KOAY, Subrata Sen · 2018 to 2026
$7.2M
Targeted Hyperpolarized Molecular Beacons for Colorectal Cancer DetectionR21EB031217 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BHATTACHARYA, PRATIP K. · 2021 to 2023
$648k
(PQC5)Early Detection Pancreatic Cancer by Hyperpolarized Silicon NanoparticlesR21CA185536 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BHATTACHARYA, PRATIP K. · 2014 to 2015
$383k
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas RP180164NCI NIH HHS R21 CA185536NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214263NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB031217Pancreatic Cancer Action Network 16-65-BHAT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging devices often use automated processing that creates and displays a self-normalized image. When improperly executed, normalization can misrepresent information or result in an inaccurate analysis. In the case of diagnostic imaging, a false positive in the absence of disease, or a negative finding when disease is present, can produce a detrimental experience for the patient and diminish their health prospects and prognosis. In many clinical settings, a medical technical specialist is trained to operate an imaging device without sufficient background information or understanding of the fundamental theory and processes involved in image creation and signal processing. Here, we describe a user-friendly image processing algorithm that mitigates user bias and allows for true signal to be distinguished from background. For proof-of-principle, we used antibody-targeted molecular imaging of colorectal cancer (CRC) in a mouse model, expressing human MUC1 at tumor sites. Lesion detection was performed using targeted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hyperpolarized silicon particles. Resulting images containing high background and artifacts were then subjected to individualized image post-processing and comparative analysis. Post-acquisition image processing allowed for co-registration of the targeted silicon signal with the anatomical proton magnetic resonance (MR) image. This new methodology allows users to calibrate a set of images, acquired with MRI, and reliably locate CRC tumors in the lower gastrointestinal tract of living mice. The method is expected to be generally useful for distinguishing true signal from background for other cancer types, improving the reliability of diagnostic MRI.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerdiagnostic imagingGUIhyperpolarizationimage processingMRIsilicon particles

Identifiers

PMID35328163
PMCPMC8947341
OpenAlexW4214531094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.