ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Comparison Study of the Two Biometers Based on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Technology.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison meta-analysis of two swept-source optical coherence biometers.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Technical failure rates for biometry between swept-source and older-generation optical coherence methods: a review and meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Pooled it
- Concordance of Cataract Biometry Measurements Obtained via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Optical Biometry.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Agreement Between Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Devices in Assessing Glistening on the Intraocular Lens In Vivo.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The comparison of white-to-white via triple person-times caliper measuring and machine-measuring in V4c implantable collamer lens implantation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a new dynamic real-time visualization 25 kHz swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Ocular Diameter Parameters Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Observational
- Toric intraocular lenses: Evidence-based use.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research aimed to investigate the potential differences in the parameters, including axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), flat keratometry (Kf), steep keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), astigmatism, white-to-white (WTW) distance, acquired rate, and intraocular lens (IOL) power, between the two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, the ANTERION (biometer A) and IOLMaster 700 (biometer B). In a prospective observational comparative case series study, we enrolled 198 eyes undergoing cataract surgery. The AL, CCT, ACD, LT, Kf, Ks, Km, astigmatism, WTW, acquired rate, and IOL power were assessed. McNemar tests compared the acquired rate, and the paired sample
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.