Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328135›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The NILS Study Protocol: A Retrospective Validation Study of an Artificial Neural Network Based Preoperative Decision-Making Tool for Noninvasive Lymph Node Staging in Women with Primary Breast Cancer (ISRCTN14341750).

Ida Skarping, Looket Dihge, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Linnea Huss, Julia Ellbrant, Mattias Ohlsson, Lisa Rydén

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ida SkarpingDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1265-8649
Looket DihgeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Pär-Ola BendahlDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Linnea HussDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8597-9224
Julia EllbrantDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Mattias OhlssonDepartment of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Division of Computational Biology and Biological Physics, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Lisa RydénDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-3130
Lund University · SE

Funding

Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse N/AGorthonstiftelsen N/ALund University N/ASouth Swedish Health Care Region (Sweden) N/ASwedish Research Council 2020-01491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) patients with clinical T1-T2 N0 disease undergo sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) biopsy, although most of them have a benign SLN. The pilot noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict nodal status was published in 2019, showing the potential to identify patients with a low risk of SLN metastasis. The aim of this study is to assess the performance measures of the model after a web-based implementation for the prediction of a healthy SLN in clinically N0 BC patients. This retrospective study was designed to validate the NILS prediction model for SLN status using preoperatively available clinicopathological and radiological data. The model results in an estimated probability of a healthy SLN for each study participant. Our primary endpoint is to report on the performance of the NILS prediction model to distinguish between healthy and metastatic SLNs (N0 vs. N+) and compare the observed and predicted event rates of benign SLNs. After validation, the prediction model may assist medical professionals and BC patients in shared decision making on omitting SLN biopsies in patients predicted to be node-negative by the NILS model. This study was prospectively registered in the ISRCTN registry (identification number: 14341750).

Indexed as

artificial neural networkaxillabreast neoplasmlymph nodesstagingvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID35328135
PMCPMC8947586
OpenAlexW4213419537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.