Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328133›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Radiomics in Cross-Sectional Adrenal Imaging: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment Study.

Arnaldo Stanzione, Roberta Galatola, Renato Cuocolo, Valeria Romeo, Francesco Verde, Pier Paolo Mainenti, Arturo Brunetti, Simone Maurea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prediction of 2-[Cancers · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arnaldo StanzioneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7905-5789
Roberta GalatolaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Renato CuocoloDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1452-1574
Valeria RomeoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1603-6396
Francesco VerdeDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9823-4678
Pier Paolo MainentiInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging of the National Research Council, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Arturo BrunettiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Simone MaureaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8269-3765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to systematically review the current literature on radiomics applied to cross-sectional adrenal imaging and assess its methodological quality. Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched to identify original research articles investigating radiomics applications on cross-sectional adrenal imaging (search end date February 2021). For qualitative synthesis, details regarding study design, aim, sample size and imaging modality were recorded as well as those regarding the radiomics pipeline (e.g., segmentation and feature extraction strategy). The methodological quality of each study was evaluated using the radiomics quality score (RQS). After duplicate removal and selection criteria application, 25 full-text articles were included and evaluated. All were retrospective studies, mostly based on CT images (17/25, 68%), with manual (19/25, 76%) and two-dimensional segmentation (13/25, 52%) being preferred. Machine learning was paired to radiomics in about half of the studies (12/25, 48%). The median total and percentage RQS scores were 2 (interquartile range, IQR = -5-8) and 6% (IQR = 0-22%), respectively. The highest and lowest scores registered were 12/36 (33%) and -5/36 (0%). The most critical issues were the absence of proper feature selection, the lack of appropriate model validation and poor data openness. The methodological quality of radiomics studies on adrenal cross-sectional imaging is heterogeneous and lower than desirable. Efforts toward building higher quality evidence are essential to facilitate the future translation into clinical practice.

Indexed as

adrenal imagingevidence-based medicinemethodological qualityradiomics

Identifiers

PMID35328133
PMCPMC8947112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.