Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328030›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Genomic Screening to Identify Food Trees Potentially Dispersed by Precolonial Indigenous Peoples.

Monica Fahey, Maurizio Rossetto, Emilie Ens, Andrew Ford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monica FaheySchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9582-0017
Maurizio RossettoResearch Centre for Ecosystem Resilience, Royal Botanic Gardens, Australian Institute of Botanical Sciences, Sydney 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4878-9114
Emilie EnsSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7732-5063
Andrew FordFormerly Tropical Forest Research Centre, CSIRO Land and Water, Atherton 4882, Australia.
Royal Botanic Garden Sydney · AUCSIRO Land and Water · AUMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over millennia, Indigenous peoples have dispersed the propagules of non-crop plants through trade, seasonal migration or attending ceremonies; and potentially increased the geographic range or abundance of many food species around the world. Genomic data can be used to reconstruct these histories. However, it can be difficult to disentangle anthropogenic from non-anthropogenic dispersal in long-lived non-crop species. We developed a genomic workflow that can be used to screen out species that show patterns consistent with faunal dispersal or long-term isolation, and identify species that carry dispersal signals of putative human influence. We used genotyping-by-sequencing (DArTseq) and whole-plastid sequencing (SKIMseq) to identify nuclear and chloroplast Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in east Australian rainforest trees (4 families, 7 genera, 15 species) with large (>30 mm) or small (<30 mm) edible fruit, either with or without a known history of use by Indigenous peoples. We employed standard population genetic analyses to test for four signals of dispersal using a limited and opportunistically acquired sample scheme. We expected different patterns for species that fall into one of three broadly described dispersal histories: (1) ongoing faunal dispersal, (2) post-megafauna isolation and (3) post-megafauna isolation followed by dispersal of putative human influence. We identified five large-fruited species that displayed strong population structure combined with signals of dispersal. We propose coalescent methods to investigate whether these genomic signals can be attributed to post-megafauna isolation and dispersal by Indigenous peoples.

Indexed as

Indigenous PeoplesTreesAustraliaFruitGenomicsHumansanthropogenic dispersalchloroplast genomeethnobotanyfruit sizegenomic screeningIndigenousinsipient domesticationnon-crop speciespropagule dispersalrainforest assembly

Identifiers

PMID35328030
PMCPMC8954434
OpenAlexW4220770444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.