Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327961›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Measuring S-Phase Duration from Asynchronous Cells Using Dual EdU-BrdU Pulse-Chase Labeling Flow Cytometry.

Marta Bialic, Baraah Al Ahmad Nachar, Maria Koźlak, Vincent Coulon, Etienne Schwob

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intramammary Labeling of Epithelial Cell Division.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Basic Methods of Cell Cycle Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Molecularly Defined Subsets of Ewing Sarcoma Tumors Differ in Their Responses to IGF1R and WEE1 Inhibition.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Safeguarding DNA Replication: A Golden Touch of MiDAS and Other Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta BialicInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, 34293 Montpellier, France.
Baraah Al Ahmad NacharInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, 34293 Montpellier, France.
Maria KoźlakInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, 34293 Montpellier, France.
Vincent CoulonInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, 34293 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-8755
Etienne SchwobInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, 34293 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9369-6419
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotes duplicate their chromosomes during the cell cycle S phase using thousands of initiation sites, tunable fork speed and megabase-long spatio-temporal replication programs. The duration of S phase is fairly constant within a given cell type, but remarkably plastic during development, cell differentiation or various stresses. Characterizing the dynamics of S phase is important as replication defects are associated with genome instability, cancer and ageing. Methods to measure S-phase duration are so far indirect, and rely on mathematical modelling or require cell synchronization. We describe here a simple and robust method to measure S-phase duration in cell cultures using a dual EdU-BrdU pulse-labeling regimen with incremental thymidine chases, and quantification by flow cytometry of cells entering and exiting S phase. Importantly, the method requires neither cell synchronization nor genome engineering, thus avoiding possible artifacts. It measures the duration of unperturbed S phases, but also the effect of drugs or mutations on it. We show that this method can be used for both adherent and suspension cells, cell lines and primary cells of different types from human, mouse and

Indexed as

ChromosomesAnimalsBromodeoxyuridineCell DivisionFlow CytometryMiceS PhaseBromodeoxyuridinecell linescytometryDNA replicationEdU-BrdU pulse chaseS phase

Identifiers

PMID35327961
PMCPMC8951228
OpenAlexW4213431581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.