Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327865›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Solving Generalized Polyomino Puzzles Using the Ising Model.

Kazuki Takabatake, Keisuke Yanagisawa, Yutaka Akiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Hybrid Opinion Formation and Polarization Model.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kazuki TakabatakeDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku 152-8550, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1138-2599
Keisuke YanagisawaDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku 152-8550, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0224-0035
Yutaka AkiyamaDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku 152-8550, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2863-8703

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP20am0101112Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K19917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the polyomino puzzle, the aim is to fill a finite space using several polyomino pieces with no overlaps or blanks. Because it is an NP-complete combinatorial optimization problem, various probabilistic and approximated approaches have been applied to find solutions. Several previous studies embedded the polyomino puzzle in a QUBO problem, where the original objective function and constraints are transformed into the Hamiltonian function of the simulated Ising model. A solution to the puzzle is obtained by searching for a ground state of Hamiltonian by simulating the dynamics of the multiple-spin system. However, previous methods could solve only tiny polyomino puzzles considering a few combinations because their Hamiltonian designs were not efficient. We propose an improved Hamiltonian design that introduces new constraints and guiding terms to weakly encourage favorable spins and pairs in the early stages of computation. The proposed model solves the pentomino puzzle represented by approximately 2000 spins with >90% probability. Additionally, we extended the method to a generalized problem where each polyomino piece could be used zero or more times and solved it with approximately 100% probability. The proposed method also appeared to be effective for the 3D polycube puzzle, which is similar to applications in fragment-based drug discovery.

Indexed as

combinatorial optimizationHopfield neural networkIsing modelpolyomino puzzle

Identifiers

PMID35327865
PMCPMC8947422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.