Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327848›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Complex Networks and the

Fernanda Andrea Martín, Denisse Pastén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fernanda Andrea MartínDeparment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago 8380453, Chile.
Denisse PasténDeparment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago 8380453, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4857-1051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies from complex networks have increased in recent years, and different applications have been utilized in geophysics. Seismicity represents a complex and dynamic system that has open questions related to earthquake occurrence. In this work, we carry out an analysis to understand the physical interpretation of two metrics of complex systems: the slope of the probability distribution of connectivity (γ) and the betweenness centrality (BC). To conduct this study, we use seismic datasets recorded from three large earthquakes that occurred in Chile: the Mw8.2 Iquique earthquake (2014), the Mw8.4 Illapel earthquake (2015) and the Mw8.8 Cauquenes earthquake (2010). We find a linear relationship between the b-value and the γ value, with an interesting finding about the ratio between the b-value and γ that gives a value of ∼0.4. We also explore a possible physical meaning of the BC. As a first result, we find that the behaviour of this metric is not the same for the three large earthquakes, and it seems that this metric is not related to the b-value and coupling of the zone. We present the first results about the physical meaning of metrics from complex networks in seismicity. These first results are promising, and we hope to be able to carry out further analyses to understand the physics that these complex network parameters represent in a seismic system.

Indexed as

b-valuecharacteristic exponentcomplex networksearthquake

Identifiers

PMID35327848
PMCPMC8947255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.