Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327773›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Both Medical and Context Elements Influence the Decision-Making Processes of Pediatricians.

Lisa Schurmans, David De Coninck, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Peter de Winter, Jaan Toelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa SchurmansFaculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-881X
David De ConinckCentre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3831-266X
Birgitte SchoenmakersDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1909-9613
Peter de WinterLeuven Child and Youth Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Jaan ToelenLeuven Child and Youth Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9339-5408

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We wanted to investigate the relationship of medical and non-medical factors with the clinical decision-making of pediatricians. We hypothesize that the addition of relevant medical information (either alarming or reassuring) will influence the physician's decision-making, but that the addition of non-medical information will also play a role. To investigate this, we designed an online questionnaire containing ten clinical case-based scenarios, of which five focused on medical factors and five on non-medical/context factors, each scored on a five-point Likert scale. In total, 113 pediatricians completed the online questionnaire. Both medical and non-medical/context factors were considered relevant to change the initial decision in most cases. Additional information of an alarming nature induces the physician to become more worried, whereas reassuring information decreases this worry. In some cases, with the medical factors, the gender and the age of the pediatrician does have some effect on the clinical decision-making. We conclude that medical decision-making is affected by multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors that differ between physicians. Our data indicate that these non-medical factors must be considered when making a medical decision, as it is crucial to be aware that they have a substantial influence on that decision-making.

Indexed as

contextual factorsmedical decision-makingpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID35327773
PMCPMC8947032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.