Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327771›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Robotic Anxiety-Parents' Perception of Robot-Assisted Pediatric Surgery.

Elisabeth Ammer, Laura Sophie Mandt, Isabelle Christine Silbersdorff, Fritz Kahl, York Hagmayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabeth AmmerDepartment of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Laura Sophie MandtGeorg-Elias-Mueller Institute for Psychology, University Goettingen, 37073 Goettingen, Germany.
Isabelle Christine SilbersdorffGeorg-Elias-Mueller Institute for Psychology, University Goettingen, 37073 Goettingen, Germany.
Fritz KahlDepartment of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
York HagmayerGeorg-Elias-Mueller Institute for Psychology, University Goettingen, 37073 Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to many other countries, robot-assisted (RA) pediatric surgery is not yet very common in Germany. Although the first pediatric RA intervention was published in 2001, RA pediatric surgery is still perceived as a "new technology". As a consequence, little is known about parents' perception of this operation method. In this study, we analyzed parents' intention to let their child undergo RA and laparoscopic (LA) surgery. Two subsamples (online and at the University Medical Center Goettingen) received a questionnaire addressing attitude towards RA and LA pediatric surgery with the help of a case example. Results showed that parents had a higher intention to consent to LA surgery. Perceiving more benefits, assuming a positive attitude of the social environment, and feeling less anxiety increased intention. A mediation analysis indicated that the type of surgery affected intentions through assumed attitude of the social environment. Exploratory analyses showed that the perception of risks and anxiety reduced intention for only RA surgery. These findings should be considered in preoperational discussions with parents. Anxiety and perceived risks should especially be addressed in order to encounter hesitancy.

Indexed as

anxietybehavioral intentionbenefit perceptionchild’s agelaparoscopic surgeryoperation methodparentspediatric surgeryrisk perceptionrobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID35327771
PMCPMC8947283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.