Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327752›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Congenital Heart Disease.

Tanya Perry, Tyler Brown, Andrew Misfeldt, David Lehenbauer, David S Cooper

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Early Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Congenital Heart Surgery.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanya PerryHeart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7002-1155
Tyler BrownHeart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Andrew MisfeldtHeart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
David LehenbauerHeart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7417-727X
David S CooperHeart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a key therapy in the management of patients with severe cardiac disease or respiratory failure. There are two major forms of MCS commonly employed in the pediatric population-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist device (VAD). These modalities have overlapping but distinct roles in the management of pediatric patients with severe cardiopulmonary compromise. The use of ECMO to provide circulatory support arose from the development of the first membrane oxygenator by George Clowes in 1957, and subsequent incorporation into pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) by Dorson and colleagues. The first successful application of ECMO in children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery was reported by Baffes et al. in 1970. For the ensuing nearly two decades, ECMO was performed sparingly and only in specialized centers with varying degrees of success. The formation of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) in 1989 allowed for the collation of ECMO-related data across multiple centers for the first time. This facilitated development of consensus guidelines for the use of ECMO in various populations. Coupled with improving ECMO technology, these advances resulted in significant improvements in ECMO utilization, morbidity, and mortality. This article will review the use of ECMO in children with congenital heart disease.

Indexed as

cardiac critical carecongenital heart diseaseECMO

Identifiers

PMID35327752
PMCPMC8947570
OpenAlexW4220722683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.