Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327729›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes toward Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in Pediatric Acute Care.

Linda S Franck, Andrea Scheurer-Monaghan, Caleb P Bupp, Joseph D Fakhoury, Thomas J Hoffmann, Manasi Deshpandey, Madison Arenchild, David P Dimmock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How Neonatologists Use Genetic Information.The Journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linda S FranckDepartment of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4291-9181
Andrea Scheurer-MonaghanNeonatal Intensive Care, Bronson Children's Hospital, Kalamazoo, MI 49007, USA.
Caleb P BuppMedical Genetics, Spectrum Health Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-0396
Joseph D FakhouryDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI 49007, USA .ORCID 0000-0001-7341-0121
Thomas J HoffmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Manasi DeshpandeyDepartment of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Madison ArenchildRady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1753-686X
David P DimmockRady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to characterize knowledge and attitudes about rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) implementation of a broad constituency of healthcare professionals at hospitals participating in a statewide initiative to implement rWGS for hospitalized neonates and children up to 18 years of age meeting clinical criteria for testing. We surveyed 307 healthcare professionals from eight hospitals about their knowledge and attitudes regarding rWGS. We examined survey internal reliability using exploratory factor analysis and associations between respondent characteristics and attitudes toward rWGS with linear regression. We thematically analyzed free-text responses. Views about rWGS implementation in respondents' own setting and respondents' personal capability to implement rWGS were generally neutral (M = 3.44 (SD = 0.74); M = 3.30 (SD = 0.85), respectively). Views about the potential for rWGS in clinical practice were overall positive (M = 4.12 (SD = 0.57)). The degree of positivity of attitudes about rWGS was strongly influenced by perceived knowledge, clinical or non-clinical role, concerns about future insurance coverage for rWGS as a first-tier test, and future adverse impact of genomics health information on patients or families. We identified several actionable factors influencing attitudes toward rWGS of pediatric healthcare professionals. Expanded education and ongoing implementation research are needed for the full potential of rWGS in pediatrics to be realized.

Indexed as

geneticsgenomicshospital medicinemedical technology and advancementpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID35327729
PMCPMC8947383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.