Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327534›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2022

Cytochromes P450 of

Lucie Larigot, Daniel Mansuy, Ilona Borowski, Xavier Coumoul, Julien Dairou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. High Nutritional Conditions Influence Feeding Plasticity in Pristionchus pacificus and Render Worms Non-Predatory.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  14. Caenorhabditis Elegans as a Model for Environmental Epigenetics.Current environmental health reports · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucie LarigotCampus Saint Germain, INSERM UMR-S 1124, Université de Paris, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
Daniel MansuyLaboratoire de Chimie et de Biochimie Pharmacologiques et Toxicologiques, CNRS, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France.
Ilona BorowskiLaboratoire de Chimie et de Biochimie Pharmacologiques et Toxicologiques, CNRS, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France.
Xavier CoumoulCampus Saint Germain, INSERM UMR-S 1124, Université de Paris, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2928-9648
Julien DairouLaboratoire de Chimie et de Biochimie Pharmacologiques et Toxicologiques, CNRS, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1767-0572
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansXenobioticsAnimalsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemGenomeSteroidsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemSteroidsXenobioticscytochrome P450predictive toxicologyworm nematodexenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35327534
PMCPMC8945457
OpenAlexW4214741906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.