Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327398›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Radiomics-Based Predictive Model of Radiation-Induced Liver Disease in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Receiving Stereo-Tactic Body Radiotherapy.

Po-Chien Shen, Wen-Yen Huang, Yang-Hong Dai, Cheng-Hsiang Lo, Jen-Fu Yang, Yu-Fu Su, Ying-Fu Wang, Chia-Feng Lu, Chun-Shu Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Po-Chien ShenNational Defense Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Wen-Yen HuangNational Defense Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Yang-Hong DaiNational Defense Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hsiang LoNational Defense Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Jen-Fu YangNational Defense Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Yu-Fu SuNational Defense Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Ying-Fu WangNational Defense Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Chia-Feng LuDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1344-9950
Chun-Shu LinNational Defense Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Tri-Service General Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

Tri-Service General Hospital TSGH-D109-181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The application of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) limited the risk of the radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) and we aimed to predict the occurrence of RILD more accurately. (2) Methods: 86 HCC patients were enrolled. We identified key predictive factors from clinical, radiomic, and dose-volumetric parameters using a multivariate analysis, sequential forward selection (SFS), and a K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm. We developed a predictive model for RILD based on these factors, using the random forest or logistic regression algorithms. (3) Results: Five key predictive factors in the training set were identified, including the albumin-bilirubin grade, difference average, strength, V5, and V30. After model training, the F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the final random forest model were 0.857, 100, 93.3, and 94.4% in the test set, respectively. Meanwhile, the logistic regression model yielded an F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.8, 66.7, 100, and 94.4% in the test set, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Based on clinical, radiomic, and dose-volumetric factors, our models achieved satisfactory performance on the prediction of the occurrence of SBRT-related RILD in HCC patients. Before undergoing SBRT, the proposed models may detect patients at high risk of RILD, allowing to assist in treatment strategies accordingly.

Indexed as

decision makingpredictive modelradiation-induced liver diseaseradiomicsstereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID35327398
PMCPMC8945465
OpenAlexW4214892459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.