Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327173›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Human-Animal Interactions with

Frances Margaret Titterington, Rachel Knox, Stephanie Buijs, Denise Elizabeth Lowe, Steven James Morrison, Francis Owen Lively, Masoud Shirali

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Welfare of beef cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Behavioural Traits inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  6. Welfare of cattle during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frances Margaret TitteringtonAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8613-1498
Rachel KnoxAgriSearch, Innovation Centre, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK.
Stephanie BuijsAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2564-5940
Denise Elizabeth LoweAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-1749
Steven James MorrisonAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK.
Francis Owen LivelyAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK.
Masoud ShiraliAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5401-0541
Agri Food and Biosciences Institute · GBAgrisearch (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) Northern Ireland 19 1 03 (48283)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle production necessitates potentially dangerous human-animal interactions. Cattle are physically strong, large animals that can inflict injuries on humans accidentally or through aggressive behaviour. This study provides a systematic review of literature relating to farm management practices (including humans involved, facilities, and the individual animal) associated with cattle temperament and human's on-farm safety. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used to frame the review. Population, Exposure, and Outcomes (PEO) components of the research question are defined as "Bovine" (population), "Handling" (exposure), and outcomes of "Behaviour", and "Safety". The review included 17 papers and identified six main themes: actions of humans; human demographics, attitude, and experience; facilities and the environment; the animal involved; under-reporting and poor records; and mitigation of dangerous interactions. Cattle-related incidents were found to be underreported, with contradictory advice to prevent injury. The introduction of standardised reporting and recording of incidents to clearly identify the behaviours and facilities which increase injuries could inform policy to reduce injuries. Global differences in management systems and animal types mean that it would be impractical to impose global methods of best practice to reduce the chance of injury. Thus, any recommendations should be regionally specific, easily accessible, and practicable.

Indexed as

behaviourfacilitieshandlinginjurymanagement

Identifiers

PMID35327173
PMCPMC8944486
OpenAlexW4220933814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.