Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327126›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Effects of Key Farm Management Practices on Pullets Welfare-A Review.

Xiaohui Du, Pingwu Qin, Yanting Liu, Felix Kwame Amevor, Gang Shu, Diyan Li, Xiaoling Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaohui DuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6788-8997
Pingwu QinCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Yanting LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Felix Kwame AmevorCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2682-1993
Gang ShuDepartment of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Diyan LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Xiaoling ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0633-4701
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Key Research & Development Plan of the Department of Science and Technology of Tibet Autonomous Region XZ202101ZY0002Nthe Projects Funded by the Central Government to Guide Local Scientific and Technological Development from Guizhou province QIANKEZHONGYINDI [2021]4003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on animal behavior and welfare have reported that improving the management practices of pullets can enhance their growth, as well as their physical and mental condition, thus benefiting the productivity of laying hens. There is growing confidence in the international community to abandon the conventional practices of "cage-rearing and beak-trimming" to improve the welfare of chickens. Therefore, in this review, we summarized some of the effective poultry management practices that have provided welfare benefits for pullets. The results are as follows: 1. Maintaining similar housing conditions at different periods alleviates fear and discomfort among pullets; 2. Pullets reared under cage-free systems have better physical conditions and temperaments than those reared in cage systems, and they are more suitable to be transferred to similar housing to lay eggs; 3. Improving flock uniformity in appearance and body size has reduced the risk of pecking and injury; 4. Maintaining an appropriate population (40-500 birds) has reduced flock aggressiveness; 5. A combination of 8-10 h of darkness and 5-30 lux of light-intensity exposure via natural or warm white LED light has achieved a welfare-performance balance in pullets. (This varies by age, strain, and activities.); 6. Dark brooders (mimicking mother hens) have alleviated fear and pecking behaviors in pullets; 7. The air quality of the chicken house has been effectively improved by optimizing feed formulation and ventilation, and by reducing fecal accumulation and fermentation; 8. Complex environments (with litter, perches, straw bales, slopes, platforms, outdoor access, etc.) have stimulated the activities of chickens and have produced good welfare effects. In conclusion, the application of comprehensive management strategies has improved the physical and mental health of pullets, which has, in turn, improved the quantity and quality of poultry products.

Indexed as

environmental managementhousing typepullet statuswelfare

Identifiers

PMID35327126
PMCPMC8944683
OpenAlexW4220975560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.