Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327049›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Factors Associated with Vaginal/Cesarean Birth Attitudes among Medical Students.

Anna Michalik, Agnieszka Czerwińska-Osipiak, Anna Szablewska, Michalina Pracowity, Jolanta Olszewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna MichalikDepartment of Obstetrical and Gynaecological Nursing, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8951-0538
Agnieszka Czerwińska-OsipiakDepartment of Obstetrical and Gynaecological Nursing, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1947-0702
Anna SzablewskaDepartment of Obstetrical and Gynaecological Nursing, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland.
Michalina PracowityDepartment of Obstetrical and Gynaecological Nursing, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland.
Jolanta OlszewskaDepartment of Obstetrical and Gynaecological Nursing, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolish perinatal care is facing a high, ever-increasing cesarean section (CS) rate that is currently at 43%. Crucially, reports have revealed that the attitudes, experiences, and skills of clinicians directly contribute to this elevated CS rate.

methodsThis cross-sectional study, which included 748 Polish medical students, aimed to identify medical students' attitudes regarding birth methods. A descriptive questionnaire was distributed via the academic email addresses of surveyed medical students. Group comparisons were performed using Welch's

resultsMidwifery students (96.2%) were the most unified group of students, with most agreeing that VB (vaginal birth) presents a safer option for women at low risk for VB-related complications vs. cesarean section. Of Medical Faculty students, 68% believed that fewer complications typically occur during vaginal birth than during CS. Students in their final vs. initial years of study furthermore considered VB more beneficial for women than CS.

conclusionsAn important factor identified at the individual clinician level is the presence of leadership and executive support. For medical students, we can interpret this as support from their trainers and supervisors.

Indexed as

attitudescesareanmedical studentsvaginal birth

Identifiers

PMID35327049
PMCPMC8954109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.